<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For English, press 1. For a human, try Fonolo.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.agrawals.org/2008/09/19/for-english-press-1-for-a-human-try-fonolo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.agrawals.org/2008/09/19/for-english-press-1-for-a-human-try-fonolo/</link>
	<description>Rocky Agrawal's blog on search, wireless, maps and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rocky Agrawal</title>
		<link>http://blog.agrawals.org/2008/09/19/for-english-press-1-for-a-human-try-fonolo/#comment-24550</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky Agrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesign.wordpress.com/?p=722#comment-24550</guid>
		<description>I think recording is an option. I haven&#039;t gotten into the beta yet, so I don&#039;t know for sure.

Legality of recording phone calls varies by state. In some states, only one party needs to know that a call being recorded. In other states, both parties need to know. (This is what caused Linda Tripp grief.)

Seeing as many companies you call say that &quot;this call may be recorded for quality or training purposes,&quot; it&#039;d be a bit hypocritical to claim that callers can&#039;t record. 

Fonolo could make for some amusing content, like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmpDSBAh6RY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vincent Ferrari case.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think recording is an option. I haven&#8217;t gotten into the beta yet, so I don&#8217;t know for sure.</p>
<p>Legality of recording phone calls varies by state. In some states, only one party needs to know that a call being recorded. In other states, both parties need to know. (This is what caused Linda Tripp grief.)</p>
<p>Seeing as many companies you call say that &#8220;this call may be recorded for quality or training purposes,&#8221; it&#8217;d be a bit hypocritical to claim that callers can&#8217;t record. </p>
<p>Fonolo could make for some amusing content, like the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmpDSBAh6RY" rel="nofollow">Vincent Ferrari case.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doris</title>
		<link>http://blog.agrawals.org/2008/09/19/for-english-press-1-for-a-human-try-fonolo/#comment-24549</link>
		<dc:creator>Doris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesign.wordpress.com/?p=722#comment-24549</guid>
		<description>Wait a sec. Fonolo records the call from its end? Is that cool with the company you&#039;re calling? I can see this being a potential legal morass if the exchange is actually trotted out as proof of something that was promised but note delivered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a sec. Fonolo records the call from its end? Is that cool with the company you&#8217;re calling? I can see this being a potential legal morass if the exchange is actually trotted out as proof of something that was promised but note delivered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
