<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Occasional reader - Jon Stewart, privacy and Fauxbama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.agrawals.org/2008/03/01/occassional-reader-jon-stewart-privacy-and-fauxbama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.agrawals.org/2008/03/01/occassional-reader-jon-stewart-privacy-and-fauxbama/</link>
	<description>Rocky Agrawal's blog on search, wireless, maps and Web 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: johnhendel</title>
		<link>http://blog.agrawals.org/2008/03/01/occassional-reader-jon-stewart-privacy-and-fauxbama/#comment-24190</link>
		<dc:creator>johnhendel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesign.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-24190</guid>
		<description>That Jon Stewart interview was fantastic. I'm surprised he found the time amid all the Oscar prep. He seemed a little tired during the interview. 

The only part that surprised me (and disappointed me a little) was when he showed some vague semblance of support for McCain in the New York Times lobbyist article "scandal." I chalk it up mostly to his unfamiliarity with the situation, but in the King interview he characterized it as a private woman thing that was brought up to smear him; in reality, it was tied to a broader ethical reality 
regarding the treatment of lobbyists and rhetoric versus action. 

Regardless, though, Stewart's an absolutely awesome guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Jon Stewart interview was fantastic. I&#8217;m surprised he found the time amid all the Oscar prep. He seemed a little tired during the interview. </p>
<p>The only part that surprised me (and disappointed me a little) was when he showed some vague semblance of support for McCain in the New York Times lobbyist article &#8220;scandal.&#8221; I chalk it up mostly to his unfamiliarity with the situation, but in the King interview he characterized it as a private woman thing that was brought up to smear him; in reality, it was tied to a broader ethical reality<br />
regarding the treatment of lobbyists and rhetoric versus action. </p>
<p>Regardless, though, Stewart&#8217;s an absolutely awesome guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
