<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalists, bloggers and parasites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.agrawals.org/2007/03/06/journalists-bloggers-and-parasites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.agrawals.org/2007/03/06/journalists-bloggers-and-parasites/</link>
	<description>Rocky Agrawal's blog on search, wireless, maps and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:57:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: isabel</title>
		<link>http://blog.agrawals.org/2007/03/06/journalists-bloggers-and-parasites/#comment-10099</link>
		<dc:creator>isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesign.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/journalists-bloggers-and-parasites/#comment-10099</guid>
		<description>I read this at OJR too. I agree that we have media to blame (or to thank) for the popularity of political blogs, and that bloggers are closer to their subjects/topics than journalists are. This is why citizen journalism (e.g. OhMyNews) is such a hit.

I read somewhere though (maybe in Global Voices? not sure now) that bloggers are not trying -- nor do they want -- to replace journos. In any case, it&#039;s interesting to see how the dynamics of the blogger-journo relationship will continue to change in favor of the reader/audience. In all this, it&#039;s the audience that should benefit.

Thanks... keep blogging...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this at OJR too. I agree that we have media to blame (or to thank) for the popularity of political blogs, and that bloggers are closer to their subjects/topics than journalists are. This is why citizen journalism (e.g. OhMyNews) is such a hit.</p>
<p>I read somewhere though (maybe in Global Voices? not sure now) that bloggers are not trying &#8212; nor do they want &#8212; to replace journos. In any case, it&#8217;s interesting to see how the dynamics of the blogger-journo relationship will continue to change in favor of the reader/audience. In all this, it&#8217;s the audience that should benefit.</p>
<p>Thanks&#8230; keep blogging&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcozna</title>
		<link>http://blog.agrawals.org/2007/03/06/journalists-bloggers-and-parasites/#comment-10097</link>
		<dc:creator>marcozna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesign.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/journalists-bloggers-and-parasites/#comment-10097</guid>
		<description>Absolutely right. 
The reverse side is that bloggers are becoming journalists. Such as Engadget, while a great site the bloggers are becoming more and more journalists which then needs to be recategorized. I predict the &quot;pro&quot; bloggers will soon separate into another category of bloggers which will merge with journalism.

Keep posting - great views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely right.<br />
The reverse side is that bloggers are becoming journalists. Such as Engadget, while a great site the bloggers are becoming more and more journalists which then needs to be recategorized. I predict the &#8220;pro&#8221; bloggers will soon separate into another category of bloggers which will merge with journalism.</p>
<p>Keep posting &#8211; great views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
